MUSINGS and other writing by Mark Kolke

TODAY'S MUSINGS

ARCHIVED COLUMNS

ARCHIVE SPRING 2012

ARCHIVE WINTER 2011/12

ARCHIVE FALL 2011

ARCHIVE SUMMER 2011

ARCHIVE SPRING 2011

ARCHIVE WINTER 2010/11

ARCHIVE FALL 2010

ARCHIVE SUMMER 2010

ARCHIVE SPRING 2010

ARCHIVE WINTER 2009/10

ARCHIVE FALL 2009

ARCHIVE SUMMER 2009

ARCHIVE SPRING 2009

ARCHIVE WINTER 2008/09

ARCHIVE FALL 2008

ARCHIVE SUMMER 2008

ARCHIVE SPRING 2008

PRIOR BLOG ARCHIVES

SELECTED OTHER WORK

FEEDBACK / COMMENTS

SHORT STORY PROJECT

POETRY PROJECT

ARCHIVED DAILY THOUGHTS

DAILY THOUGHTS 2012

DAILY THOUGHTS 2011

DAILY THOUGHTS 2010

DAILY THOUGHTS 2009

DAILY THOUGHTS 2008

DAILY THOUGHTS 2007

WHY I WRITE MUSINGS

CONTACT

. . . . . . there is no edge to openness

MANY LENS DAY

 

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

today’s Musing  written and published from Cranston in south- east  Calgary, near the Bow River valley

 

Morning walk:  5C/41F, sunny again, man flowering shrubs and trees have burst forth while others seem moments away. I think it ironic, now that the first day of June has arrived, that May day trees have started to flower – proof positive the growing season is a month late . . .

 

 

Is reality real?  Is reality fact, belief, perception – or viewpoint?

 

Dreams and visions are necessary, they keep us going from month to month, season to season – from year to year without rhyme or reason.  But, when we open our eyes, we see, mostly, through two lenses.

 

Our eyes, our eyeglasses, our vision – sees best when we have both open. Obviously, unless we have a weird prescription difference between two eyes, we see the same thing with two lenses than we do with one.  If we close one, we see the same thing – but with two lenses at work we see more, deeper, wider and clearer. We see more detail, interesting detail.

 

It occurs to me, as I make this analogy, that our brains have lenses too – but they don’t see the same things at the same time; while one lens sees possibility, another sees impossibility.  At about that time other lenses kick into gear – looking forward, backward and sideways – all at the same time.

 

Our brain doesn’t have peripheral vision – that’s the province of the eyes, but when we close our eyes we can see anything we want to see.  We can see the stars, moon and northern lights in the middle of the day simply by closing our eyes and wishing it so.

 

We can see good in people, whether it is there or not simply because we know it once was or because we wish it to be.  We can see bad in people – again, without regard to whether it is true simply because we imagine it that way.

 

We can see life as long, healthy – stretched out as far as stretching and future medical breakthroughs might take us, but when we open our eyes to reality, it just ain’t so.

 

We have no idea where our limitations end, so how can we imagine someone else’s?

 

I’m just thinking . . .

 

Testing our mettle is theoretical, testing our character and seeing how it feels is a more complicated exercise. I think the best way is to run it up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes.  Not to suggest that recognition by others is as important as our own perceptions – but sometimes it is a good idea to do some comparing.

 

The way I see it, you see it your way. I can see it your way, but at the same time I see it my way.  Can both be right?  Yes, and both could be wrong for everyone else in the world.  That doesn’t matter.

 

I live for me.

 

You live for you.

 

Only when we try to see someone else’s vision through their eyes – and try to adopt that view – do we realize how truly screwed up life can get sometimes.

 

When that happens we need to come back to some place we call home, or call it being centered – to gain our perspective all over again.

 

 

Mark Kolke

312,184

 

 

May 31 -  BIG ONE COMING

Most people make birthdays a big deal and, for that reason, I don’t care for them but for some, they aren’t a big enough deal.  Your daughter’s efforts are a wonderful gesture for someone who needs and deserves that attention from time to time, as you do. EC, Chicago, IL

 

EXAMINED LIFE, OFF AND ON

I just read your story.  It has lots of good and interesting detail but I think the problem might be too much good and interesting detail.  I  think it would be better to edit it down to one story - about taking a dump and waiting for Freda - and leave out all the Jeanette stuff. From the beginning it seems as if the love story with her will be the  main event but it isn't; and since you are focusing on the inner life of a guy stuck in a bathroom with an immediate problem I would stick more to that immediate problem and digress less.  That is just my advice. I have often found I want to tell two stories when one is what I should be telling, MD, Calgary, AB


Sign up to get MUSINGS by Email
» click HERE to be added to our list!
For Email Marketing you can trust






 

Responses /  feedback and comments always welcome; please use the feedback form above, or , if you wish, send a direct email to Mark Kolke at:   dailycolumn@markkolke.com



Feedback welcome - use this feedback form ↓ ↓ ↓

First Name
Last Name
City
State
Country
E-mail Address
Comments
 




Mark Kolke © 2003 - 2012 all rights reserved - published by MaxComm Communications